Building permits-codes
Curious to find out what the deal is with building codes/permits. A local business decided they needed a new building. I was told they could not tear down the existing building until the new one was up, or an addition was made to the existing structure, before tearing down the existing structure. He said it would have cost much less, and be much quicker if they could have just torn it down, and started over. I'd really like to know why this is, what's the thinking behind it. As it looks, seem like a lot of govt. control, and waste of money.
Quite often we reconstruct garages that were built to close to the property lines. If we tear it down to the foundation we then need to get a variance to reconstruct it or we end up moving the ...»
I live in a modest community. 2200 square foot capes. Along comes someone who loved our low tax base but not the size of the home. So somehow they managed to get by all of the neighbor's and constructed a 3500 sq ft house. (but did not change the footprint) Way over sized for the property. ...»
In addition, because taxes play such a large roll in home costs, people do not care anymore about over building. They get the larger home they want and a good tax break for several years before the taxes come up to what the real value of the home is.
I was in a house several years ago that was being marketed as new. When I was at the inspection I noticed some older framing on one part of the house. Found out that they did not tear down the entire home when they rebuilt it. So in my report I put in the real age of the structure and boy did the sparks fly from that. The buyer got in the face of the realtor who misrepresented the fact that the house was a rebuild. Not NEW as she had stated in the MLS. I got pulled into the mix from the realtor saying I had no business in dating the home. Go figure. It was the tried and true story of shooting the messenger.
The simple fact remains. Unless everything is new, it is still an old home.